The vast majority of celebrations of traditional liturgy are not "characterized by a rejection not only of the liturgical reform, but of the Vatican Council II itself". Sed contra, the bastions of traditional liturgy are often found among the two Ecclesia Dei orders who are very careful not to tread on Church authorities, the validity of the new liturgy, or the legitimacy of the Council.
Moreover, we are in the ninth year of this pontificate, and serious attempts to restrict the celebration of traditional liturgy only began last year with restrictions on private Masses in St. Peter's Basilica and the survey issued to the bishops on the implementation of Summorum Pontificum.
In fact, Pope Francis granted SSPX clergy the faculty to celebrate the sacrament of penance licitly for the Year of Mercy in 2015, then extended this faculty in Misericordia et Misera in 2016(1). During 2015, Bishop Athanasius Schneider was also sent to visit SSPX seminaries in the United States and in France, at the request of the Holy See.
We're left with two questions. Why does the Pope feel compelled to restrict traditional liturgy in the belief that its devotees are rejecting the Council? And what changed between 2016, when the Pope was going far toward accommodating the SSPX and those who frequent its sacraments, and 2020 when he began moves to restrict traditional liturgy?
Is there a vocal figure, familiar to the Pope, who has more recently begun to celebrate traditional liturgy and who is "characterized by a rejection not only of the liturgical reform, but of the Vatican Council II itself"?
(1): https://canonlawmadeeasy.com/2020/04/23/attend-sspx-church-parish-closed/
No comments:
Post a Comment